A lawyer is bound by ethics, not a charter
A charter is given from 1 institution to another (there are 2 parties)
In Agile (or teams) - its an agreement by a team to an organisation
-
Insights from retrospectives often feedback into charters
But writing this cown can cause problems (e.g. if not negotiable it will cause problems - it can be useful to keep it as a draft until the project ends)
Changes occur when everyone agrees
Q: How long will it take to update
Charter directs teams and:
gives them identity and focus
as well as a direction to deliver
unique contribution that this team gives
Its sensible for both parties of a charter to participate
Can take a starting point to a team, but they would normally amend it to sign up to it
Q: How is a charter different from a mission statement (To investigate)
How do you prevent people from throwing the charter back at you? You need some flexibility